Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media 2015;16(4):67-81.
Published online November 30, 2015.
Arendt Meets Malamud on the Bridge Called the Banality of Thoughtlessness
Geon-Geun Lee
Abstract
This paper attempts to extend the philosophy of Eichmann (Young, 2007) to the themes of The Assistant based on Hannah Arendt’s theories. So far, many films have derived from the works of literature and not vice versa. However, if a film is metaphysical and introspective, it will help students learn literature more efficiently by throwing a lot of questions rather than establishing answers beforehand. For example, in Eichmann, the character Arendt argues that Eichmann’s guilt of Jewish massacre is attributed to the banality of evil, which denies the human plurality. And also, she insists an average man committed war crimes without any sense of guilt by using the power of evil totalitarianism. Nevertheless, this concept has been misinterpreted in the way that evildoing is just ordinary and political. Thus, the researcher aims to observe her intention in Eichmann based on its original text, Eichmann in Jerusalem and then extend and rediscover it in the name of the banality of thoughtlessness caused by modern civilization in The Assistant, which the other scholars have not covered much. As a result, it is found that thoughtlessness is characteristic in superficiality meaning no roots in its foundation, lacking in the inner dialogue between one and oneself.
Key Words: Hannah Arendt;the banality of evil;Bernard Malamud;the human plurality;the banality of thoughtlessness
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 863 View
  • 3 Download
Related articles


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#1219, Bugak building, Kookmin University,
Jeongneung-ro 77, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02707, Korea
E-mail: stem@stemedia.co.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by The Society for Teaching English through Media.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next